Nottingham is Crap reports a story from the architects’ web site, BD Online, that the city hopes to be the 2012 World Design Capital.
Notwithstanding previous comments I’ve made about Nottingham’s delusions of grandeur, there’s nothing wrong with such a grand ambition providing we actually have some chance of winning (although I’m not sure what Nottingham has to do to qualify for such a prestigious title).
It is awarded by the snappily-named International Council of Societies of Industrial Design, which describes itself as an international, non-governmental organisation for professional industrial design. Probably none of us have ever heard of them (apart from architects and professional industrial designers who may be reading this) but it sounds as if they know what they’re talking about doesn’t it?
I’d like to think that some of the buildings mentioned in the BD Online article might swing it for us but I don’t suppose our cause was helped by the recent City Council Planning Committee meeting which considered the first application for a building in the prestigious Eastside Regeneration Zone. Having declared: “We have a golden opportunity here to do something substantial…. I have to say I am underwhelmed by the iconic building we are proposing to start this off”, Councillor Malcolm Wood went on to say: “I think we have got the opportunity here to do something pretty dynamic. Frankly I have not got the confidence we are going to deliver.”
Let’s hope the ICSID weren’t listening.
Fortunately, applications have closed for WDC 2012 so this probably won’t have affected Nottingham’s chances. The shortlist will be announced in July.
Fingers crossed.




It’s only skin deep…
A recent report in the British Journal of Dermatology indicates that a product manufactured by the Nottingham-based Boots Company can improve the appearance of skin in older people and reduce wrinkles.
The Evening Post expects queues of people to form at Boots shops to buy this miracle ointment, as I’m sure they will.
Good for Boots… but how sad, in the grand scheme of things, that pathetic, vain people will clamour to spend almost £20 a time for this stuff in a desperate attempt to cling to their youth and keep normal ageing at bay. That amount of money would buy a week’s shopping for some people in the UK and probably support the needs of a family in the developing world for over a month… in countries where old age begins at 30 and average life expectancy can be as low as 45.
As much as I’m sure we could all point at each other and suggest things we could do without in our lives, this story seems to epitomise the very worst excesses in spending on research in the cosmetics industry (God only knows what the costs of the seven scientists working on this product were) and in the skewed priorities we in the ‘developed’ world now have.