News that Nottingham City Council will be seeking the power, next year, to ban all street drinking is, on balance, good news I think.
Sights like this might be a thing of the past in Nottingham
Although I like to think of myself as an advocate of civil liberties, there has to come a time when certain sorts of behaviour by individuals are curtailed in the interests of the majority… and I think street drinking is one of these.
Usually associated more with summer activities (and weather) than with this time of year, there are still certain places in the city where you frequently see people wending their way down the street gripping a can of Special Brew or a bottle of cider and there are a number of well-know haunts where groups of street drinkers gather and share their various tipples. Whilst this might constitute a fairly low form of anti-social behaviour, it can be intimidating for many people, is often accompanied by loud drunken banter and can sometimes be a pre-cursor to more serious forms of behaviour that are far more problematic than the mere drinking of the alcohol that’s caused them.
But the question for the authorities has to be: How enforceable are such rules? There are currently three designated ‘no drinking’ zones in the city, one of which is around Hyson Green and another in the city centre, I believe. Following the introduction of the first of these, the authorities were slow to get to grips with drinkers around Asda and, when they eventually did, they only succeeded in forcing them to move to other parts of the area not covered by the ban or where they were less likely to be detected. Like CCTV, the effect of such prohibitions can often be simply to move the problem to someone else’s back yard rather than address its causes or actually rectify it.
It seems to me that if the city is serious about tackling this issue, they should be considering working with some of the charities that address homelessness, alcohol-dependency and the other social problems that lead to these people feeling the need to spend a significant proportion of their day out of it on cut-price supermarket plonk and beer that could double for rocket fuel.
Whether they have the wit, wisdom or will for that though, is another matter.
On a lighter note, presumably, if a city-wide ban does come into force, the drinkers will have to give up, hide or move over the boundary into the county. That might be good for city residents but I can’t see Mrs Cutts at County Hall being very happy about it… which is probably another good reason for the City Council to do it as soon as they can.
Catalyst for change or artistic apartheid?
The New Art Exchange in Hyson Green has recently won another award, scooping a design ‘oscar’ in RIBA’s 2009 awards. Coming on the first anniversary of the opening of this impressive building, it must be very good news for those associated with the project.
However, the New Art Exchange is much more than an iconic building. It is also a showcase for African, Caribbean and South Asian art; one of the only such facilities in the country. It is also meant to be, in the words of the Evening Post: “A catalyst in the regeneration of Hyson Green”.
New Art Exchange: Jewel in the crown or sore thumb?
“This ’striking black cube’, says the Evening Post (quoting, I suspect, from RIBA), “is built in tough black engineering brick with an arrangement of multiple windows enabling local people to see much of the activity going on inside. In turn, people inside have views looking out at all angles, connecting them to the streets outside, helping to forge stronger links with the local community.”
And the RIBA judges said: “The challenge was to bring together two rival arts organisations, one Afro-Caribbean (sic) and the other Asian. The building has clearly established a lively exchange and collaboration between the two communities.”
But are any of these things true… or does the New Art Exchange actually represent a sort of cultural apartheid where black art is consigned to a ghetto gallery in one of Nottingham’s most deprived and disadvantaged areas with the more mainstream – and probably mainly white – art being showcased at the much higher profile Nottingham Contemporary, due to open next week in the city centre?
In an area with huge cultural diversity but where the majority population is still white, has the New Art Exchange actually helped to forge stronger links within the community or acted as a catalyst for regeneration?
There have been some very impressive exhibitions at the NAE and it is certainly being used and visited by more people, both local and from other parts of the country (and, apparently, from other parts of the world). But has it really brought about the sort of economic or social change in Hyson Green that the investment of large sums of money by organisations like the Arts Council, Nottingham City Council, Greater Nottingham Partnership, East Midlands Development Agency and New Deal for Communities were intended to stimulate? More importantly, is it really capable of doing so without being part of a much more cohesive and properly planned strategic development of the area, which it doesn’t really seem to be?
And has the NAE, in the words of its director, Skinder Hundal in an interview with Nottingham Visual Arts succeeded in bridging the gap between Hyson Green and the wider city and in making the venue relevant to local people?
Nottingham Contemporary: Will the NAE be an equal partner or poor relation?
Mr Hundal told NVA: “It is important that local people engage with us as a venue: the venue undoubtedly needs that local engagement in and with local communities. But the wider Nottingham community is absolutely important as well. Essentially we are looking to connect greater Nottingham with the inner city, and beyond that we want to look at the huge issues facing the world community. It is important that greater Nottingham engages on a real level, to connect the mono-cultural with the diverse-cultural, so that there is a shared value base between young people, old people, families and different communities.”
He went on: “We’re conscious that we want to represent unheard voices, culturally diverse expression, and we’re also conscious that – being based in this location – we reflect as best we can the cultural diversity of the location.”
Many would say that this is art-speak; cultural gobbledegook mixed with regeneration rhetoric and jargon that will mean little to people in Hyson Green where most are still poor and more pre-occupied with crime, litter, anti-social behaviour and urban decay than they are with ‘culturally diverse expression’.
Which is not to say that art and culture are not important in people’s lives; of course they are. But this is a gallery specifically dedicated to ethnic minority art in a poor area on the edge of the city, facing, I would argue (despite Mr Hundal’s talk of co-operation) competition from Nottingham Contemporary and trying to convince a relatively small potential audience that the New Art Exchange is not only relevant to their lives but can actually improve them both materially and spiritually.
The building is iconic and the project ambitious but awards for architecture will not be the measure of the NAE’s success. The genuine engagement of the people of Hyson Green and of Nottingham will be and the degree to which such a facility can enrich and improve their lives. And if this doesn’t happen, it will be hard to defend the whole project against the allegation that’s it’s just a cosy, self-interested indulgence for the local art glitterati and a high-profile and expensive way for the public funders involved to demonstrate their equal opportunities credentials.